Browsing: Criminal Law
Supreme Court: Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 102 CrPC in Prevention of Corruption Act Cases
News summary In State of West Bengal v. Anil Kumar Dey (2025 INSC 1413), the Supreme Court resolved a major controversy on whether investigating agencies can…
Supreme Court: Test Identification Parade Not Reliable If Witness Saw Accused Before TIP
News summary The Supreme Court of India, in Criminal Appeal Nos. 697 of 2024 (Raj Kumar Bheema v. State of NCT of Delhi), critically examined the…
Supreme Court Rules DNA Test Unnecessary When Paternity Question Has No Link to the Offence
News summary The Supreme Court of India, in a recent judgment, had set aside an order passed by the Madras High Court, which compelled a person…
Supreme Court Orders Trial Courts to Ensure Timely Victim Compensation in Criminal Cases
News summary The Supreme Court, while ordering that all Special and Sessions Courts pass orders for victim compensation in appropriate criminal cases to ensure timely disbursal…
Supreme Court Clarifies: Magistrate Can Order FIR Registration Under Section 156(3) CrPC When Complaint Reveals Cognizable Offence
News Summary The Supreme Court of India has further clarified the procedure provided under Section 156(3) of the Code on November 4, 2025. The SC held…
Demand And Acceptance Must Be Proven: SC Says Recovery of Notes Alone Not Sufficient for Conviction
News summary The Supreme Court of India, in P. Somaraju v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025 INSC 1263), reaffirmed the principle that the mere recovery of…
Kerala High Court: Duration of Interim Bail Not Counted as ‘Detention Period’ for Statutory Bail Under Section 187 BNSS
Kerala High Court has held that time spent by an accused on interim/temporary bail cannot be counted as “detention” for computing the statutory period for default…
Supreme Court: Remand Court’s Explanation Doesn’t Satisfy UAPA Requirement to Furnish Grounds of Arrest
The Supreme Court has set aside the arrest and remand of three accused booked under UAPA and IPC, holding that Section 43B UAPA and Article 22(1)…
Delhi HC: Alleging Physical Relationship Without Proof Doesn’t Constitute Rape, Acquits Man In Posco Case
The Delhi High Court has acquitted Rahul Bhupinder Verma, previously convicted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri held that allegations of “physical relations” without clear details or supporting evidence cannot substantiate charges of rape or penetrative sexual assault. The court noted that terms like “physical relations” and “sambandh” must be explicitly defined to meet the legal standards. It further observed delays in filing the FIR, lack of medical or forensic proof, and absence of foundational facts for applying the statutory presumption under Section 29 of POCSO.
News Summary The Supreme Court of India recently quashed criminal proceedings against a woman’s in-laws in a dowry harassment case, holding that vague and general allegations…
News
- Trending
- Featured Post
- Know The Law
- High Court
- Supreme Court
- Neuro Amicus Exclusive
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.