Opinion
Courts are becoming key players in climate action, with nearly 3,000 cases filed worldwide by mid-2025. Judicial intervention addresses gaps left by weak political enforcement, as seen in landmark cases like Urgenda and Lliuya. Using human rights and tort law, courts hold governments and companies accountable without making policy. Critics’ concerns about overreach are countered by courts’ reliance on expert evidence. Strengthening climate litigation requires specialized climate courts, clear legal targets, and corporate risk integration. The article argues that judicial oversight is essential to turn climate promises into real action.
Access to the internet is now essential for exercising basic rights like free speech, information, and participation in democracy. Courts and international bodies, including the UN and the European Court of Human Rights, have recognized this. India’s Supreme Court in Amar Jain v. Union of India (2025) affirmed digital access as part of the right to life. Blanket shutdowns and vague censorship laws threaten freedoms and must meet legal tests of necessity and legitimacy. A rights-based digital framework—ensuring net neutrality, fair access, and transparent governance—is vital to protect democracy in the digital age.
AI at Work: A Revolution with Risks—Can We Seize Its Promise Without Sacrificing Equity?
AI is transforming workplaces by streamlining hiring, evaluations, and daily tasks, but it raises serious legal and ethical issues. Biased data and opaque algorithms can replicate discrimination, as seen in Amazon’s flawed hiring tool. Beyond bias, AI may displace millions of jobs by 2030, demanding strong retraining and safety nets. Legal responses are emerging, like the EU’s AI Act and U.S. bias audit rules, but remain fragmented. Experts urge human oversight, transparency, audits, and clear laws to ensure AI enhances rather than replaces work. The challenge is building systems that are both efficient and fair.
Supreme Court Records Assam’s Eviction Procedure For Reserved Forest Encroachments, Orders Status Quo Pending Due Process
The Supreme Court of India has disposed of a batch of civil appeals and writ petitions filed by Abdul Khalek and other residents of several villages situated within notified reserved…
Supreme Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Land Acquisition Appeals Under RFCTLARR Act, Clarifies Applicability of Limitation Act
The Supreme Court in The Deputy Commissioner and Special Land Acquisition Officer v. M/s S.V. Global Mill Limited and over 500 connected matters has held that appeals under Section 74…
Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Direct Police To Follow Section 41A CrPC After Refusing To Quash FIR
The Supreme Court in Practical Solutions Inc. (through Authorised Representative) v. State of Telangana & Ors. set aside a Telangana High Court order which, while disposing of a petition to…
Subscribe to News
Get the latest sports news from NewsSite about world, sports and politics.
News
- Trending
- Featured Post
- Know The Law
- High Court
- Supreme Court
- Neuro Amicus Exclusive
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.