Browsing: procedural law
News summary The news concerns a recent Supreme Court judgment in Kangra Central Cooperative Bank Ltd v Kangra Central Cooperative Bank Pensioners Welfare Association (Regd.) &…
Supreme Court: Test Identification Parade Not Reliable If Witness Saw Accused Before TIP
News summary The Supreme Court of India, in Criminal Appeal Nos. 697 of 2024 (Raj Kumar Bheema v. State of NCT of Delhi), critically examined the…
News summary In a significant ruling in 2024, the Supreme Court of India clarified how review petitions should be handled in cases that were decided based…
Supreme Court Reiterates: Counterclaim Under Order 8 Rule 6A CPC Can Be Filed Only Against the Plaintiff, Not Co-Defendants
News summary In Sanjay Tiwari vs. Yugal Kishore Prasad Sao & Ors (2025), the Supreme Court of India reaffirmed that under Order 8 Rule 6A of…
In order to prevent needless delays in the enforcement of decrees, the Supreme Court of India issued a significant directive prohibiting executing courts from permitting the…
The Supreme Court has clarified that delay alone in pronouncing an arbitral award does not invalidate it; however, an undue and unexplained delay that demonstrably affects…
News Summary The Supreme Court has delivered a landmark decision clarifying the legal parameters for invoking a plea of demurrer—an objection that tests the legal sufficiency…
Kerala High Court: Duration of Interim Bail Not Counted as ‘Detention Period’ for Statutory Bail Under Section 187 BNSS
Kerala High Court has held that time spent by an accused on interim/temporary bail cannot be counted as “detention” for computing the statutory period for default…
The Supreme Court has directed the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Dehradun, to dispose of a pending securitisation application within the statutory period under Section 17(5) of the SARFAESI Act—60 days, extendable up to four months with recorded reasons. A bench of Justices Sanjay Kumar and Alok Aradhe, hearing Indian Overseas Bank v. Radhey Infra Solutions (P) Ltd., set aside the High Court’s non-intervention approach and criticised the DRT for delay. The Court underscored that extensions must be justified in writing, stressing the legislature’s intent for swift resolution of such applications.
SC Says Criminal Courts Can Only Fix Clerical Mistakes, Not Recall or review it’s judgement
The Supreme Court held that criminal courts cannot review or recall their own final, signed orders except to correct clerical or arithmetical mistakes, and set aside the Rajasthan High Court’s recall and transfer of two FIR investigations to the CBI. It ruled that inherent powers under Section 482 (now Section 528 BNSS) cannot override the bar in Section 362 CrPC (now Section 403 BNSS). The Court restored finality to the earlier order and allowed parties to seek appropriate remedies.
News
- Trending
- Featured Post
- Know The Law
- High Court
- Supreme Court
- Neuro Amicus Exclusive
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.