Friday, June 5

Opinion

Courts are becoming key players in climate action, with nearly 3,000 cases filed worldwide by mid-2025. Judicial intervention addresses gaps left by weak political enforcement, as seen in landmark cases like Urgenda and Lliuya. Using human rights and tort law, courts hold governments and companies accountable without making policy. Critics’ concerns about overreach are countered by courts’ reliance on expert evidence. Strengthening climate litigation requires specialized climate courts, clear legal targets, and corporate risk integration. The article argues that judicial oversight is essential to turn climate promises into real action.

Read More

Access to the internet is now essential for exercising basic rights like free speech, information, and participation in democracy. Courts and international bodies, including the UN and the European Court of Human Rights, have recognized this. India’s Supreme Court in Amar Jain v. Union of India (2025) affirmed digital access as part of the right to life. Blanket shutdowns and vague censorship laws threaten freedoms and must meet legal tests of necessity and legitimacy. A rights-based digital framework—ensuring net neutrality, fair access, and transparent governance—is vital to protect democracy in the digital age.

AI is transforming workplaces by streamlining hiring, evaluations, and daily tasks, but it raises serious legal and ethical issues. Biased data and opaque algorithms can replicate discrimination, as seen in Amazon’s flawed hiring tool. Beyond bias, AI may displace millions of jobs by 2030, demanding strong retraining and safety nets. Legal responses are emerging, like the EU’s AI Act and U.S. bias audit rules, but remain fragmented. Experts urge human oversight, transparency, audits, and clear laws to ensure AI enhances rather than replaces work. The challenge is building systems that are both efficient and fair.