Himachal Pradesh High Court
The Himachal Pradesh High Court, in Padam Sharma & Ors. v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. (CWP No. 12099 of 2024, decided 17…
Supreme Court Records Assam’s Eviction Procedure For Reserved Forest Encroachments, Orders Status Quo Pending Due Process
The Supreme Court of India has disposed of a batch of civil appeals and writ petitions filed by Abdul Khalek and other residents of several villages situated within notified reserved…
Supreme Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Land Acquisition Appeals Under RFCTLARR Act, Clarifies Applicability of Limitation Act
The Supreme Court in The Deputy Commissioner and Special Land Acquisition Officer v. M/s S.V. Global Mill Limited and over 500 connected matters has held that appeals under Section 74…
Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Direct Police To Follow Section 41A CrPC After Refusing To Quash FIR
In Practical Solutions Inc. v. State of Telangana, the Supreme Court held that when a High Court refuses to quash an FIR, it cannot indirectly protect the accused from arrest by directing the police to follow procedures like notice under Section 35(3) BNSS (earlier Section 41A CrPC) without proper reasons. The Court said such relief can be granted only after considering the merits and hearing the complainant. Relying on Neeharika Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra, it set aside the High Court’s order and sent the case back for fresh consideration.
Subscribe to News
Get the latest sports news from NewsSite about world, sports and politics.
News
- Trending
- Featured Post
- Know The Law
- High Court
- Supreme Court
- Neuro Amicus Exclusive
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.